Peter Buchsbaum I Mortgage Banker I NMLS #133257
The Week Ahead…What Consumer Sentiment, Wholesale Trade, and the Treasury Budget means to you! Real Estate Reality Radio…Buying a home with a little help from my friends. The Week Ahead…What Productivity, Employment Costs, Confidence and the Employment Situation Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Congressman Fitzpatrick’s Constituant Advocates How to Right Side Up if you are Upside Down! The Week Ahead…PPI, CPI, Housing Starts just to name a few. Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Mario Henry from HALO America The Week Ahead…Europe, Earnings and 2012 Outlook! Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Agent/Owner Diane Cleland The Week Ahead…Jobs, Jobs, Jobs… Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Sandy McQuail the “Credit Doctor” The Week Ahead…The final reading for 2011
The Week Ahead…What Consumer Sentiment, Wholesale Trade, and the Treasury Budget means to you! Sunday, 5 February 2012 Market Focus:  After a very busy week with an exciting last day this week pales in comparison. Not a lot of action but certainly a lot of talk from Fed officials. Keep one eye on Europe again. Monday: No Economic Reports Richard Fisher (Dallas Federal Reserve President) Speaks Tuesday: Consumer Credit: The dollar value of [...]
Real Estate Reality Radio…Buying a home with a little help from my friends. Friday, 3 February 2012 Hello, and welcome to Real Estate Reality Radio. The most important hour of radio every Friday from 9 to 10 on WBCB 1490 am. Thank you for joining Vince and me. For those of you who are not familiar with the show I am the guy with a bow tie and a bit of an [...]
The Week Ahead…What Productivity, Employment Costs, Confidence and the Employment Situation Sunday, 29 January 2012 The Week Ahead… Market Focus: A very busy week of reports about income, employment costs, confidence, productivity and the all important employment report. All of this with the back drop of the Florida GOP primary and Greece’s ongoing drama. Should prove interesting. Monday: Personal Income and Outlays: Personal income is the dollar value of income received from [...]
Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Congressman Fitzpatrick’s Constituant Advocates Friday, 20 January 2012 Welcome to Real Estate Reality Radio. The most important hour of radio every Friday from 9 to 10 on WBCB 1490 am. Thank you for joining Vince and me. For those of you who are not familiar with the show I am the guy with a bow tie and a bit of an attitude and [...]
How to Right Side Up if you are Upside Down! Wednesday, 18 January 2012 This past weekend I spent time with some very special people from Right Side Up. The list of members included Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick and two of his “constituent advocates”, two counselors from Bucks County Housing, the “credit doctor” from United One Resources, and out team coach Kathy Gentner from Keller Williams. I mentioned all of [...]
The Week Ahead…PPI, CPI, Housing Starts just to name a few. Sunday, 15 January 2012 Market Focus: With the S & P downgrade of 9 Eurozone countries the US markets should be under some added pressure. The positives will be found if the inflation numbers remain low as expected. Monday: US Holiday: Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Bond, Equity Markets Closed Tuesday: Empire State MFG: The New York Fed conducts [...]
Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Mario Henry from HALO America Friday, 13 January 2012 Hello, and welcome to Real Estate Reality Radio. The most important hour of radio every Friday from 9 to 10 on WBCB 1490 am. Thank you for joining Vince and me. For those of you who are not familiar with the show I am the guy with a bow tie and a bit of an [...]
The Week Ahead…Europe, Earnings and 2012 Outlook! Sunday, 8 January 2012 Market Focus: Europe All over again. With a look back at 4th quarter earnings as well as a look ahead to 2012. It should be another volatile week. Monday: Consumer Credit: The dollar value of consumer installment credit outstanding. Changes in consumer credit indicate the state of consumer finances and portend future spending patterns. The [...]
Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Agent/Owner Diane Cleland Friday, 6 January 2012 Hello, and welcome to Real Estate Reality Radio. The most important hour of radio every Friday from 9 to 10 on WBCB 1490 am. Thank you for joining Vince and me. For those of you who are not familiar with the show I am the guy with a bow tie and a bit of an [...]
The Week Ahead…Jobs, Jobs, Jobs… Sunday, 1 January 2011 Market Focus: If Real Estate is Location, Location, Location this week should be Jobs, Jobs, Jobs! Monday: All Markets Closed: New Years Day Observed Tuesday: ISM Mfg Index: The Institute for Supply Management surveys more than 300 manufacturing firms on employment, production, new orders, supplier deliveries, and inventories. Readings above (below) 50 percent indicate an [...]
Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Sandy McQuail the “Credit Doctor” Friday, 30 December 2011 Hello, and welcome to Real Estate Reality Radio. The most important hour of radio every Friday from 9 to 10 on WBCB 1490 am. Thank you for joining Vince and me. For those of you who are not familiar with the show I am the guy with a bow tie and a bit of an [...]
The Week Ahead…The final reading for 2011 Sunday, 25 December 2011 Market Focus: Next week brings data on home sales, consumer confidence, weekly unemployment claims and a reading on manufacturing activity in the Chicago area. Stocks have been supported recently by signs of improvement in the U.S. economy, including declines in initial claims for jobless benefits and an uptick in construction. Low volume is still the [...]
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 08, 2012
Font Size

Posts Tagged ‘financial seminars’

In light of the blog I wrote the other day, I am taking the liberty of writing another in considerable disbelief after diving into the article Deficit Cutters Eye Mortgage Tax Deduction.  If you are familiar with the incredibly popular Windows Phone 7 commercial, in which ridiculous yet amusing misdirected attention elicits the response of “Really…,” the title of this blog will become clear in less than a minute. Just keep reading; I’ll cue you.

In its attempt to trim $3.8 trillion in debt, The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (an oxymoron if ever there was one) has aimed its sights on the mortgage interest tax deduction. Everybody has weighed in – almost. The President of the National Association of Home Builders leveled the threat that this move would not only cause values to drop and result in even more foreclosures, but that the negative repercussions would travel up and down the entire housing chain. Conversely, according to the article, the consensus among economists is that the current interest deduction is “regressive and promotes overconsumption.”

Before I get into my debate of “good vs. bad,” I cannot help but yell rather loudly here that there is one group that has decided wait to weigh in. The official opinion of the National Association of Realtors is that “any comments ” prior to the commission’s final report due Dec. 1 “would be premature and based on conjecture.” And here we go folks, all together now:

Really … ?

Please. Stand up and be heard. This is your livelihood.

I agree with Mark Zandi of Moody’s Analytics that the deduction provides the opposite effect than what it set out to promote – homeownership as a “reward” for owning your own home. According to Zandi, it costs the treasury $100 billion and is simply reflected in higher house prices and thus does not result in higher housing affordability. But NOW is not the time to do anything that will adversely affect values.

The biggest objection my borrowers give me is that they want to wait for values to stop falling before they commit. After the market stabilizes, I can see entertaining the idea of phasing in some changes, and I certainly see no reason that we can’t regionalize the minimum loan amount. More expensive areas could hold a higher threshold. Why not treat the number like the FHA calculates their maximum loan limits? Makes one think…

Really.

March 23rd 2010 our Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner promised to fix mortgages while testifying to the senate banking committee. To better understand the latest news from Washington I thought a little history was necessary.

During the Great Depression, as borrowers defaulted on mortgages banks found themselves strapped for cash, President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Congress created Fannie Mae in 1938 in order to buy mortgages from lenders, freeing up capital that could go to other borrowers. Although Fannie Mae began with just $1 billion in purchasing power, the agency helped usher in a new generation of American home ownership, paving the way for banks to loan money. Fannie Mae grew so large over the years that in 1968, with the pressures of the Vietnam War straining the national budget, President Lyndon Johnson took Fannie Mae’s debt portfolio off the government balance sheet; Fannie Mae was converted into a publicly traded company owned by investors. Two years later, Freddie Mac was launched, primarily to keep Fannie Mae from functioning as a monopoly. It went public in 1989. Today, the two companies dominate the mortgage market. In 2008 Fannie and Freddie were holding $5 trillion in debt. They were holding nearly 1 in every 5 loans made.

Fannie and Freddie raise cash to buy mortgages from a variety of sources, including pension funds, mutual funds and foreign governments. Their influence on economies at home and abroad is pervasive enough that the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury felt they had little choice but to offer assurances that the companies will not be permitted to collapse. In some ways, the Federal Reserve’s current promise to loan the companies money, along with the Treasury Dept.’s proposal to invest in them if it becomes necessary, echo the days when the government first stepped into the mortgage market. Just as it was in 1938, the idea is to use tax dollars to prevent a complete meltdown in the U.S. financial sector that could trigger a global panic. We’re not in a Great Depression, but the intervention is an indication of how concerned the government is about more turmoil to come.

So why are they in trouble?

As home prices fell, so did the value of the mortgages the companies held, lowering their already small cushions of capital. As more of the loans they had backed went bad, they were no longer able to raise money from private sources.

So why should we care?

If the government hadn’t stepped in, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had failed, the damage to the mortgage and housing markets would have been huge. The overall financial system and the nation’s economy also could have been hurt badly. In addition, the federal government is now explicitly guaranteeing debt issued by Fannie and Freddie. If defaults on mortgages held by Fannie and Freddie are greater than currently expected, the amount paid by taxpayers could be substantial.

So back to yesterdays testimony. According to Mr. Geithner the long awaited overhaul of Fannie and Freddie could start to take shape this year. Geithner acknowledged that devising a new system to finance U.S. house purchases would be a “complicated, consequential” process. He emphasized that he hasn’t “seen an ideal model” to replace the current arrangement, which is widely viewed as undesirable because of its role in inflating the housing bubble and the conflict between Fannie and Freddie’s profit-seeking and public policy missions.

But with the Senate moving ahead on reform of bank regulation, “we’re at a point to begin” the process of shaping housing-finance legislation, Geithner said. “I don’t see why it should take years.” Geithner said Tuesday the government will eventually recognize “substantial losses” from running the companies.

0:00 /4:22Geithner’s bailout burden

At the same time, Geithner said it would take time to create a plan that keeps mortgage credit widely available, protects consumers and ensures the financial system remains stable.

Fannie and Freddie have emerged as central to the administration’s support for the nation’s troubled housing markets. The Treasury’s funding for the companies and the Federal Reserve’s purchases of their debt have kept U.S. mortgage rates at historically low levels, making houses more affordable and offering some support to tattered bank balance sheets. Geithner said he believes there is “a quite strong economic and public policy case” for federal mortgage guarantees of some sort. He cited the need for “a stable housing finance market.”

Geithner said the administration will solicit comments starting next month from “a wide variety of constituents, market participants, academic experts, and consumer and community organizations.”

Treasury’s Geithner Urges End to Fannie, Freddie ‘Ambiguity’

By Rebecca Christie and Phil Mattingly

March 23 (Bloomberg) — U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said the government should end the “ambiguity” over its involvement in mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

“Private gains can no longer be supported by the umbrella of public protection, capital standards must be higher and excessive risk-taking must be appropriately restrained,” Geithner said in testimony prepared for the House Financial Services Committee that was obtained by Bloomberg News. The hearing is scheduled for today at 10 a.m. in Washington.

Geithner said the Treasury Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development will issue a request for comment by April 15 on how to overhaul the U.S. housing-finance system and its regulatory structure. The government needs to make sure there is “no ambiguity over the status or allowable activities of any private entity which enjoys any benefits or protections from the government,” he said.

At the same time, Geithner pledged that the Obama administration would seek to avoid disruptions in the market for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s debt and mortgage-backed securities. He said investors should not doubt the U.S. government’s commitment to backstop the obligations of the two companies, which have been in conservatorship since 2008.

Sufficient Capital

“It should be clear that the government is committed to ensuring that the GSEs have sufficient capital to perform under any guarantees issued now or in the future and the ability to meet any of their debt obligations,” Geithner said. “The administration will take care not to pursue policies or reforms in a way that would threaten to disrupt the function or liquidity of these securities or the ability of the GSEs to honor their obligations.”

The testimony expands on Geithner’s call yesterday for a “fresh, cold look” at the government’s role in housing. In a speech at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, the Treasury chief said he is “looking forward to reforming” the government-sponsored enterprises — or GSEs, as Fannie and Freddie are known — even though that process has been put off while the Obama administration focuses on priorities including a financial regulatory overhaul.

The administration’s delay in offering its plan for Fannie and Freddie has drawn criticism from Republican lawmakers who are already critical of President Barack Obama’s approach to toughening financial oversight.

‘No’ Strategy

Representative Jeb Hensarling, a Republican from Texas, said yesterday that the administration should explain why it has “no exit strategy” from its 2008 takeover of the two mortgage- finance companies.

Geithner said in his prepared testimony for today’s hearing that the government had “few viable alternatives” to its extensive support of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac because the two companies are so central to the housing market. Private capital isn’t available in sufficient strength to fund the mortgage market and make credit widely available, he said.

Before the government stepped in, the two companies guaranteed more than $5 trillion in residential mortgage-based securities, or almost half of the U.S. residential mortgage market, Geithner said. They also had more than $1.7 trillion in outstanding debt, held equally by foreign and U.S.-based investors, he said.

Treasury Backstop

The Treasury in December said it would provide as much support to the GSEs as needed over the next three years. At that time, the Treasury also eased its requirements for the two companies to shrink their portfolios.

Geithner said the Treasury is still “firmly committed” to shrinking the firms in the long run. He also reiterated that the two companies are unlikely to exceed previous projections on government assistance.

“Neither company was near the previous $200 billion per institution limit in December, and neither is likely to exceed those caps even under a range of very conservative assumptions,” Geithner said.

The Treasury secretary laid out broad objectives for weighing how to change Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, along with other housing organizations such as the Federal Home Loan Banks and the Federal Housing Administration. He said there are “a variety of mechanisms” the government could use to promote stability and also provide subsidies to parts of the market.

New Incentives

The housing finance system needs to have incentives that are aligned to encourage the mortgage industry to work toward long-term health instead of short-term gains, Geithner said. Private gains shouldn’t be allowed when the public bears the brunt of losses, and mortgage finance companies should be required to hold sufficient capital and avoid abusive practices.

Mortgage products should be standardized and support a liquid secondary market, with a broad base of investors and “accurate and transparent pricing,” Geithner said. Government housing policy should aim to promote widely available mortgage credit, financial stability and affordable housing options for lower-income households, he said.

“Action is needed to ensure that markets are more stable, consumers are protected, credit is widely accessible and important housing policy objectives, such as affordable housing for low and moderate income families, are administered effectively and efficiently,” Geithner said. “Government has a key role to play in that new system, but its role, and the role of the GSEs in particular, will be fundamentally different from the role played in the past.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Rebecca Christie in Washington at rchristie4@bloomberg.netPhil Mattingly in Washington at pmattingly@bloomberg.net;

Rates on 30-year mortgages edge up, but remain below 5 percent as Fed prepares exit

ap

WASHINGTON (AP) — Mortgage rates held below the 5 percent threshold for the third straight week as the Federal Reserve prepares to end a program that has kept rates at or near record lows.

The average rate on a 30-year fixed rate mortgage edged up to 4.96 percent this week from 4.95 percent a week earlier, the mortgage finance company Freddie Mac said Thursday.

Rates dropped to a record low of 4.71 percent in December and have hovered around 5 percent since, kept down by the Fed’s $1.25 trillion program to buy up mortgage securities issued by Freddie Mac and sibling company Fannie Mae.

The Fed said this week that this program would end on March 31, as expected. But some analysts fear that once the program ends, mortgage rates could rise. That could weaken the fragile recovery in housing and the overall economy. Still, the Fed has left the door open to extending the program if the economy weakens.

The central bank has been the dominant buyer of mortgage securities over the past year. Without the Fed’s participation, “it may take a few weeks for the market to sort out whether there’s enough demand to soak up the supply,” said Greg McBride, senior financial analyst with Bankrate.com.

Freddie Mac collects mortgage rates on Monday through Wednesday of each week from lenders around the country. Rates often fluctuate significantly, even within a given day, often in line with long-term Treasury bonds.

This week, the average rate on a 15-year fixed-rate mortgage was 4.33 percent, up from 4.32 percent last week, according to Freddie Mac.

Rates on five-year, adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 4.09 percent, up from 4.05 percent a week earlier. Rates on one-year, adjustable-rate mortgages fell to 4.12 percent from 4.22 percent.

The rates do not include add-on fees known as points. One point is equal to 1 percent of the total loan amount.

The nationwide fee for loans in Freddie Mac’s survey averaged 0.7 of a point for 30-year loans and 0.6 of a point for the other loans in Freddie Mac’s survey.

Posted on Tue, Mar. 16, 2010

In time for spring house-hunting, an end to Fed’s role

By Alan J. Heavens

PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER REAL ESTATE WRITER

As spring real estate season kicks in and the tax-credit deadline for sale agreements approaches, the government is ending a program that has kept interest rates low and housing-affordability levels high for months.

On March 31, the Federal Reserve will stop buying mortgage-backed securities from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, returning control of interest rates to private investors.

For months, industry observers have predicted that once government supports are removed, interest rates will rise quickly, pushing many of the first-time buyers critical to housing’s recovery out of the market.

In late summer and fall 2009, lured by fixed 30-year mortgage rates under 5 percent and the first $8,000 tax credit, which expired Nov. 30, first-timers pushed sales of previously owned homes to the highest levels in at least three years, reducing record inventories and braking price declines.

That tax credit was renewed Nov. 5 and expanded to buyers who had not purchased a property in five years, although the credit for repeat buyers is $6,500.

The second credit expires April 30, is unlikely to be renewed, and remains the engine moving buyers.

“Not a single one has expressed concern about interest rates,” said Cheryl Miller of Long & Foster Real Estate in Blue Bell, acknowledging that “there is, I suppose, a false sense of security regarding rates remaining low.”

As the date for the Fed pullout approaches, analysts now generally agree that an immediate rate spike is no longer the likely result.

“We think there will be a significant increase in private demand [for mortgage-backed securities] to take the place of the Fed,” said David Berson, chief economist at PMI Group in Walnut Creek, Calif. Not enough to offset the Fed’s departure, he said, with rates possibly increasing a quarter of a percentage point, “but a significant one.”

Bankrate.com columnist Holden Lewis said rates are so low now – averaging 4.87 percent for a 30-year fixed this week – that an increase “is inevitable. But maybe they’ll rise gradually instead of jumping” April 1.

The Fed says it will stop buying “by” March 31 instead of “at” the end of the month, meaning that it likely has reduced its purchases and rates haven’t risen, Lewis said.

Moody’s Economy.com chief economist Mark Zandi, based in West Chester, said rates will “drift” higher in summer and fall, with the half a percentage point the Fed’s action cut working its way back in – mainly because investors believe the government would return if they got too high.

For that reason, Philadelphia mortgage broker Fred Glick said, rates won’t change.

“If the old buyers don’t come back, the Fed will intercede again to ensure rates during a continued slowly recovering economy will not go so high as to stymie a positive direction,” Glick said.

Buyers of these securities “now see that the lenders have instituted rigorous standards to ensure that the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac paper they are buying are very good loans,” he said.

On the other hand, said Holland, Bucks County-based economist Joel L. Naroff, low rates are not sustainable, and “the only way to get the market to stand on its own is to get people to become realistic again about prices and rates.”

Rates will likely rise, but “the level will still be historically low,” Naroff said.

When rates do rise, likely by year’s end, it won’t be because of the Fed’s action, but “natural macroeconomic forces” like a recovering economy and the high budget deficit, said Lawrence Yun, National Association of Realtors chief economist.

The possibility of renewed Fed intervention will likely prevent rate increases resulting from private investors demanding large risk spreads, said economist Brian Bethune of IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Mass.

As a result, Bethune and IHS economist Patrick Newport believe, the rate will be at only 5.25 percent by the fourth quarter.

Many Fed officials have emphasized that “high unemployment and tame inflation warrant a continued promise to hold rates very low for a long time,” said Peter Buchsbaum, of Arlington Capital Mortgage in Horsham.

Some analysts expect the expansion to ease, “and I am sure the Fed does not want to extinguish the fragile recovery,” Buchsbaum said.

Treasury bond yields “did not move much after the Fed completed its $300 billion in purchases in November,” said Jerome Scarpello, of Leo Mortgage in Spring House, “meaning they were able to exit and not disrupt that market.”

Rates will rise, he said, but not as high as the one percentage point others predict.

“With unemployment high and foreclosures an issue, a significant rate increase can push home prices down,” Scarpello said, “and hamper the slight recovery we now have.”