The Week Ahead…What Homes Sales and Durable Goods mean to you! Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Joe Willse of New Your Life The Week Ahead…What CPI and Housing Market Index mean to you! Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Lauren and James Cronmiller discussing how to pick the right Agent The Week Ahead… What Producer Price Index, Consumer Sentiment, and Import Prices Mean to You! Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring another hour with Brian Meara The Week Ahead…What Factory Orders, Productivity, Costs and the Employment Situation Means to you! Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Brian Meara the Short Sale Stallion The Week ahead…What the FOMC meeting, Pending home sales, and GDP mean to you! Real Estate Reality Radio Featuring Alison Tulio from Midatlantic Tax Solutions The Week Ahead…What Retail Sales, Leading Indicators,Housing Starts Mean to You! Real Estate Reality Radio Featuring Richard Hoback Reverse Mortgage Specialist
The Week Ahead…What Homes Sales and Durable Goods mean to you! Sunday, 20 May 2012 Market Focus: This week, we get more news on housing, with existing home sales on Tuesday and new home sales this Wednesday. Also out Thursday are the latest numbers on durable-goods orders, as well as the weekly jobless claims. This week, the primary focus will again be on the Europe. While I don’t expect anything [...]
Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Joe Willse of New Your Life Thursday, 17 May 2012 Hello, and welcome to Real Estate Reality Radio. The most important hour of radio every Friday from 9 to 10 on WBCB 1490 am. Thank you for joining Vince and me. For those of you who are not familiar with the show I am the guy with a bow tie and a bit of an [...]
The Week Ahead…What CPI and Housing Market Index mean to you! Sunday, 13 May 2012 Market Focus: Volatility should be this week’s mantra. JP Morgan Chase, Greece and a thin calendar. All of this should make for a choppy week. Monday: No Reports Tuesday: CPI: The Consumer Price Index is a measure of the average price level of a fixed basket of goods and services purchased by consumers. Monthly changes [...]
Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Lauren and James Cronmiller discussing how to pick the right Agent Friday, 11 May 2012   Hello, and welcome to Real Estate Reality Radio. The most important hour of radio every Friday from 9 to 10 on WBCB 1490 am. Thank you for joining Vince and me. For those of you who are not familiar with the show I am the guy with a bow tie and a bit of [...]
The Week Ahead… What Producer Price Index, Consumer Sentiment, and Import Prices Mean to You! Sunday, 6 May 2012 Market Focus: Europe, Producer Price Index, Consumer Sentiment and lots of Fed Speak. Elections in France and Greece should hold the edge with a thin economic calendar. Monday: Consumer Credit: The dollar value of consumer installment credit outstanding. Changes in consumer credit indicate the state of consumer finances and portend future spending patterns. The consensus [...]
Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring another hour with Brian Meara Friday, 4 May 2012 Hello, and welcome to Real Estate Reality Radio. The most important hour of radio every Friday from 9 to 10 on WBCB 1490 am. Thank you for joining Vince and me. For those of you who are not familiar with the show I am the guy with a bow tie and a bit of an [...]
The Week Ahead…What Factory Orders, Productivity, Costs and the Employment Situation Means to you! Sunday, 29 April 2012 Market Focus: This week’s release of a slew of economic data including the U.S. labor market coincides with the beginning of the latter half of corporate earnings. This will be keenly watched to see if they are enough to allow stocks to break above the recent trading range. Watch for any surprises. Monday: Personal Income [...]
Real Estate Reality Radio…Featuring Brian Meara the Short Sale Stallion Friday, 27 April 2012   Hello, and welcome to Real Estate Reality Radio. The most important hour of radio every Friday from 9 to 10 on WBCB 1490 am. Thank you for joining Vince and me. For those of you who are not familiar with the show I am the guy with a bow tie and a bit of [...]
The Week ahead…What the FOMC meeting, Pending home sales, and GDP mean to you! Sunday, 22 April 2012 Market Focus: Dare I say it again but Europe is center stage again as earning season hits its stride. While the growth has been steady it has also been unimpressive. This week should be a push and pull between earnings and jitters over Europe. Monday: No Reports Tuesday: The FOMC Meeting begins: The Federal Open [...]
Real Estate Reality Radio Featuring Alison Tulio from Midatlantic Tax Solutions Friday, 20 April 2012 Hello, and welcome to Real Estate Reality Radio. The most important hour of radio every Friday from 9 to 10 on WBCB 1490 am. Thank you for joining Vince and me. For those of you who are not familiar with the show I am the guy with a bow tie and a bit of an [...]
The Week Ahead…What Retail Sales, Leading Indicators,Housing Starts Mean to You! Sunday, 15 April 2012 Market Focus: While last week was a rollercoaster ride of sorts you may want buckle up for this week. Three housing reports and earnings season at full force. Let’s not lose sight of Europe. Monday: Retail Sales: Retail sales measure the total receipts at stores that sell durable and nondurable goods. Consumer spending accounts for [...]
Real Estate Reality Radio Featuring Richard Hoback Reverse Mortgage Specialist Friday, 13 April 2012 Hello, and welcome to Real Estate Reality Radio. The most important hour of radio every Friday from 9 to 10 on WBCB 1490 am. Thank you for joining Vince and me. For those of you who are not familiar with the show I am the guy with a bow tie and a bit of an [...]

Posts Tagged ‘first time home owners’

Market Focus: The spike in oil puts the emphasis on the timeliest data possible. A slowing in the Chicago PMI could hint at oil-related headwinds. Watch out for the Employment Report

Monday:

Personal Income and Outlays: Personal income is the dollar value of income received from all sources by individuals. Personal outlays include consumer purchases of durable and nondurable goods, and services. Personal Spending is expected to increase .4%. Consumer Spending is expected to rise .4%. And the Core PCE Price index is expected to increase .2%.  Why Investors Care: The income and outlays data are another handy way to gauge the strength of the consumer sector in this economy and where it is headed. Income gives households the power to spend and/or save. Spending greases the wheels of the economy and keeps it growing. The consumption (outlays) part of this report is even more directly tied to the economy, which we know usually dictates how the markets perform. Income is the major determinant of spending — U.S. consumers spend roughly 95 cents of each new dollar. Consumer spending accounts directly for more than two-thirds of overall economic activity and indirectly influences capital spending, inventory investment and imports.

Chicago PMI: The Institute of Supply Management – Chicago compiles a survey and a composite diffusion index of business conditions in the Chicago area. Manufacturing and non-manufacturing firms are both surveyed. Hence, it is not directly comparable to pure manufacturing surveys. Readings above 50 percent indicate an expanding business sector. Consensus is a small decline to 68. Why Investors Care: Investors should track economic data like the Chicago PMI to understand the economic backdrop for the various markets. The stock market likes to see healthy economic growth because that translates to higher corporate profits. The bond market prefers a moderate growth environment that won’t generate inflationary pressures.  Markets focus on the overall index – the Business Barometer which many refer to as the Chicago PMI. The breakeven point for the index is 50. Readings above 50 indicate positive growth while numbers below 50 indicate contraction. The farther the reading is from 50, the more rapid the pace of growth or decline.

Speakers Include: Boston Federal Reserve President and New Your Federal Reserve President.

Tuesday:

Motor Vehicle Sales: Unit sales of domestically produced cars and light duty trucks (including sport utility vehicles and mini-vans). Individual manufacturers report usually report sales on the first business day of the month. Motor vehicle sales are good indicators of trends in consumer spending. The consensus is looking at a slight decline.  Why Investors Care: Since motor vehicle sales are an important element of consumer spending, market players watch this closely to get a handle on the direction of the economy. The pattern of consumption spending is one of the foremost influences on stock and bond markets.

ICSC Goldman Store Sales: This weekly measure of comparable store sales at major retail chains, published by the International Council of Shopping Centers, is related to the general merchandise portion of retail sales. It accounts for roughly 10 percent of total retail sales. Why Investors Care: The ICSC-Goldman index is one of the more timely indicators of consumer spending, since it is reported every week. The pattern in consumer spending is often the foremost influence on stock and bond markets. Consumer spending accounts for more than two-thirds of the economy, so if you know what consumers are up to, you’ll have a pretty good handle on where the economy is headed.

Redbook: A weekly measure of sales at chain stores, discounters, and department stores. It is a less consistent indicator of retail sales than the weekly ICSC index. It is also calculated differently than other indicators. For instance, figures for the first week of the month are compared with the average for the entire previous month. Why Investors Care: Consumer spending accounts for two-thirds of the economy, so if you know what consumers are up to, you’ll have a pretty good handle on where the economy is headed.

ISM Mfg Index: The Institute for Supply Management surveys more than 300 manufacturing firms on employment, production, new orders, supplier deliveries, and inventories. A composite diffusion index of national manufacturing conditions is constructed, where readings above (below) 50 percent indicate an expanding (contracting) factory sector.  The consensus is looking for a slight decline. Why Investors Care: The ISM manufacturing data give a detailed look at the manufacturing sector, how busy it is and where things are headed. Since the manufacturing sector is a major source of cyclical variability in the economy, this report has a big influence on the markets. More than one of the ISM sub-indexes provides insight on commodity prices and clues regarding the potential for developing inflation. The Federal Reserve keeps a close watch on this report that helps it to determine the direction of interest rates when inflation signals are flashing in these data.

Construction Spending: The dollar value of new construction activity on residential, non-residential, and public projects. Data are available in nominal and real (inflation-adjusted) dollars. Consensus estimates are pointing to a .8% decline. Why Investors Care: Construction spending has a direct bearing on stocks, bonds and commodities because it is a part of the economy that is affected by interest rates, business cash flow and even federal fiscal policy. On a technical note, construction outlays for private residential, private nonresidential, and government are key inputs into three components of GDP–residential investment, nonresidential structures investment, and the structures portion of government expenditures.

Speakers Include Ben Bernanke.

Wednesday:

Challenger Job Cut Report: This monthly report counts and categorizes announcements of corporate layoffs based on mass layoff data from state departments of labor. The job-cut report must be analyzed with caution. It doesn’t distinguish between layoffs scheduled for the short-term or the long term, or whether job cuts are handled through attrition or actual layoffs. Why Investors Care: The job-cut report is basically a rehash of the weekly jobless claims report but provides additional insight into where layoffs are occurring. There is industry and geographic (states) detail that is not available with the weekly jobless claims.

ADP Employment Report: The ADP national employment report is computed from a subset of ADP records that in the last six months of 2008, represented approximately 400,000 U.S. business clients and approximately 24 million U.S. employees working in all private industrial sectors. The data are collected for pay periods that can be interpolated to include the week of the 12th of each month, and processed with statistical methodologies similar to those used by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to compute employment from its monthly survey of establishments. Why Investors Care: ADP national employment report can help improve the payroll forecast by providing information in advance of the employment report. The employment statistics also provide insight on wage trends, and wage inflation is high on the list of enemies for the Federal Reserve. Fed officials constantly monitor this data watching for even the smallest signs of potential inflationary pressures, even when economic conditions are soggy.

Beige Book: Got its name from the color of the book’s cover. This book is produced roughly two weeks before the monetary policy meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee. On each occasion, a different Fed district bank compiles anecdotal evidence on economic conditions from each of the 12 Federal Reserve districts. Why Investors Care: If the Beige Book portrays an overheating economy or inflationary pressures, the Fed may be more inclined to raise interest rates in order to moderate the economic pace. Conversely, if the Beige Book portrays economic difficulties or recessionary conditions, the Fed may see the need to lower interest rates in order to stimulate activity.

Speakers include Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank President and Ben Bernanke.

Thursday:

Chain store Sales: Monthly sales volumes from individual department, chain, discount, and apparel stores are usually reported on the first Thursday of each month. Chain store sales correspond with roughly 10 percent of retail sales. Chain store sales are an indicator of retail sales and consumer spending trends. Why Investors Care: Just a few words of caution. Sales are reported as a change from the same month, a year ago. It is important to know how strong sales actually were a year ago to make sense of this year’s sales. In addition, sales are usually reported for “comparable stores” in case of company mergers. Chain store sales not only give you a sense of the big picture, but also the trends among individual retailers and different store categories. Perhaps the discount chains such as Target and Wal-Mart are doing well, but the high-end department stores such as Tiffany’s are lagging. Maybe apparel specialty retailers are showing exceptional growth.

Monster Employment Index: The Index presents a snapshot of employer online recruitment activity nationwide. Why Investors Care: In addition to providing insight on the general strength of the economy, this report gives a sense of how many jobs employers are trying to fill. If that number is relatively high, it could mean there is a shortage of available workers and companies may have to offer higher wages to attract them. This leads to wage inflation, which is bad news for the stock and bond markets. Federal Reserve officials are always worried about the potential for inflationary pressures.

Jobless Claims: New unemployment claims are compiled weekly to show the number of individuals who filed for unemployment insurance for the first time. An increasing (decreasing) trend suggests a deteriorating (improving) labor market. The four-week moving average of new claims smoothes out weekly volatility.  The consensus estimate is for a slight rise.                  Why Investors Care: By tracking the number of jobless claims, investors can gain a sense of how tight, or how loose, the job market is. If wage inflation threatens, it’s a good bet that interest rates will rise, bond and stock prices will fall.

Productivity and Costs: Productivity measures the growth of labor efficiency in producing the economy’s goods and services. Unit labor costs reflect the labor costs of producing each unit of output. Both are followed as indicators of future inflationary trends. The consensus is for a 2.6% rise in Productivity but a drop of .3% in Unit Labor Costs. Why Investors Care: Productivity growth is critical because it allows for higher wages and faster economic growth without inflationary consequences. In periods of robust economic growth, productivity ensures that inflation will remain well behaved despite tight labor markets. Productivity growth is also a key factor in helping to increase the overall wealth of an economy since real wage gains can be made when workers are more productive per hour.

Friday:

Employment Situation: The employment situation is a set of labor market indicators based on two separate surveys in this one report. Based on the Household Survey, the unemployment rate measures the number of unemployed as a percentage of the labor force. Other key series come from the Establishment Survey (of business establishments). Nonfarm payroll employment counts the number of paid employees working part-time or full-time in the nation’s business and government establishments. The average workweek reflects the number of hours worked in the nonfarm sector. Average hourly earnings reveal the basic hourly rate for major industries as indicated in nonfarm payrolls. The Consensus is for a rise from last month to 180,000 new non-farm payroll. An increase from 9% to 9.1% in the “unemployment rate” and a slight decrease in hourly earnings. Why Investors Care: The employment situation is the primary monthly indicator of aggregate economic activity because it encompasses all major sectors of the economy. It is comprehensive and available early in the month. Many other economic indicators are dependent upon its information. It not only reveals information about the labor market, but about income and production as well. In short, it provides clues about other economic indicators reported for the month and plays a big role in influencing financial market psychology during the month.  The employment data give the most comprehensive report on how many people are looking for jobs, how many have them, what they’re getting paid and how many hours they are working. These numbers are the best way to gauge the current state as well as the future direction of the economy. Nonfarm payrolls are categorized by sectors.

Factory Orders: Factory orders represent the dollar level of new orders for both durable and nondurable goods. This report gives more complete information than the advance durable goods report which is released one or two weeks earlier in the month. Consensus estimates  are calling for a big increase from .2% to 2%. Why Investors Care: By tracking economic data like factory orders, investors will know what the economic backdrop is for these markets and their portfolios. The orders data show how busy factories will be in coming months as manufacturers work to fill those orders. This report provides insight to the demand for not only hard goods such as refrigerators and cars, but nondurables such as cigarettes and apparel. In addition to new orders, analysts monitor unfilled orders, an indicator of the backlog in production.

I recently read a news release from Freddie Mac, the 2nd largest government sponsored entity. Higher fees translate to tighter lending, and the updates continue to focus on borrowers classified as those with “less than perfect” credit profiles established by credit scoring. These borrowers will now face higher closing costs and mortgage rates, but the new changes affect not just the weakest borrowers; the middle-tier ones are being hit as well. For example, a borrower with a 715 score and 77% loan to value will now pay approximately .25% higher rate. A borrower with a 695 credit score will pay about .5% higher in interest rates.

 Two thoughts come to mind. First, when did a 715 credit score become a cause for punishment? Second, when are we going to learn from history? In 1934, the housing economy was going nowhere. Home prices were falling. Joblessness was at levels never seen before. Terms for mortgages were very difficult to meet. Sound familiar? Along came the FHA. By lightening up on the lending rules, homeownership increased, housing prices stabilized, and more people began to work.

 I am not advocating that we lend money like it is 2005 all over again. I am, however, suggesting that we get away from automated lending decisions and credit scoring. Lending decisions should be made by people trained to understand a credit report rather than a machine that utilizes mysterious criteria.

 The Real Estate bubble was actually created by using credit scores; at that point though, the very same scores helped determine that we could lend to anyone with a pulse. The mortgage market imploded because we created mortgages which made little to no sense, but they satisfied appetites for hunger beyond folks’ economic means. Just think of the negative amortization loans and interest only loans we provided to the average everyday consumer who at best was looking at a cost of living increase each year…

 Now we have migrated into a world where GMAC mortgage has overlays which will not allow a borrower to buy a home under the “flipping waiver” set by the FHA. This means a lender using my (yours too) tax dollars as a loan to get out of bankruptcy will not lend a borrower with a 715 credit score a mortgage to buy a home that has transferred ownership in the past 90 days. Visit the above linked waiver (see determination) to understand how these purchases again help the housing economy.

 I have concluded from all of this that the GSE’s and the banking sector reached the verge of bankruptcy and needed our help financially. So we, as tax payers, lent money to our own version of a “less than” borrower with a less than perfect credit history, who has elected to add insult to injury in choosing to ignore history’s lessons on how to help pick up and reinvigorate our economy.

After a holiday shortened week, the bond market has a lot to digest in the week ahead.

With Black Friday having come and gone, analysts will be looking for clues. If the sales were strong it will help reinforce recent data that consumer spending is picking up, unemployment is ticking down, and consumer confidence is at higher levels. Greece and Ireland have accepted bailouts with Spain and Portugal next in line.

 Now for the actual reports and their importance to the interest rate markets: Tuesday has the release of the “Chicago PMI.” Last month came in at 60.6 and the consensus for this month is 61. A reading above 50 indicates an expanding business sector, and the Chicago region somewhat mirrors the nation in its distribution of manufacturing and non-manufacturing activity. Also to be released is “Consumer Confidence,” an important report as retail sales move in tandem with consumer confidence. Last month’s reading was 50.2 and the consensus for this month is a reading of 52 – historic lows.

 Wednesday has four releases. First up, “The Challenger Report” is important in that it is somewhat of a leading indicator for jobless claims. Last month, 37,986 layoffs were reported. Then there’s “ADP Employment,” which is seen as a precursor for the big jobs report on the first Friday of every month. “Productivity and Costs” showed a gain last month in productivity of 1.9% with a unit labor cost of -.1%. The consensus is for an increase in productivity to 2.4% with no increase in the unit labor costs. This is obviously important for a peak at potential inflation. “The Beige Book” is a look at economic conditions used by the FMOC to set interest rates.

 Thursday’s release is the weekly unemployment claims. The consensus is for an increase from 407,000 to 425,000.

 Friday has two major releases: “The Jobs Report” last month showed a sizable increase in job growth with 151,000 new jobs created. The consensus for this month is for an increase of 168,000 and hourly earnings up .2%. “Factory Orders” which were up last month 2.1% are expected to have decreased .8% this month.

Treasury’s Geithner Urges End to Fannie, Freddie ‘Ambiguity’

By Rebecca Christie and Phil Mattingly

March 23 (Bloomberg) — U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said the government should end the “ambiguity” over its involvement in mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

“Private gains can no longer be supported by the umbrella of public protection, capital standards must be higher and excessive risk-taking must be appropriately restrained,” Geithner said in testimony prepared for the House Financial Services Committee that was obtained by Bloomberg News. The hearing is scheduled for today at 10 a.m. in Washington.

Geithner said the Treasury Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development will issue a request for comment by April 15 on how to overhaul the U.S. housing-finance system and its regulatory structure. The government needs to make sure there is “no ambiguity over the status or allowable activities of any private entity which enjoys any benefits or protections from the government,” he said.

At the same time, Geithner pledged that the Obama administration would seek to avoid disruptions in the market for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s debt and mortgage-backed securities. He said investors should not doubt the U.S. government’s commitment to backstop the obligations of the two companies, which have been in conservatorship since 2008.

Sufficient Capital

“It should be clear that the government is committed to ensuring that the GSEs have sufficient capital to perform under any guarantees issued now or in the future and the ability to meet any of their debt obligations,” Geithner said. “The administration will take care not to pursue policies or reforms in a way that would threaten to disrupt the function or liquidity of these securities or the ability of the GSEs to honor their obligations.”

The testimony expands on Geithner’s call yesterday for a “fresh, cold look” at the government’s role in housing. In a speech at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, the Treasury chief said he is “looking forward to reforming” the government-sponsored enterprises — or GSEs, as Fannie and Freddie are known — even though that process has been put off while the Obama administration focuses on priorities including a financial regulatory overhaul.

The administration’s delay in offering its plan for Fannie and Freddie has drawn criticism from Republican lawmakers who are already critical of President Barack Obama’s approach to toughening financial oversight.

‘No’ Strategy

Representative Jeb Hensarling, a Republican from Texas, said yesterday that the administration should explain why it has “no exit strategy” from its 2008 takeover of the two mortgage- finance companies.

Geithner said in his prepared testimony for today’s hearing that the government had “few viable alternatives” to its extensive support of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac because the two companies are so central to the housing market. Private capital isn’t available in sufficient strength to fund the mortgage market and make credit widely available, he said.

Before the government stepped in, the two companies guaranteed more than $5 trillion in residential mortgage-based securities, or almost half of the U.S. residential mortgage market, Geithner said. They also had more than $1.7 trillion in outstanding debt, held equally by foreign and U.S.-based investors, he said.

Treasury Backstop

The Treasury in December said it would provide as much support to the GSEs as needed over the next three years. At that time, the Treasury also eased its requirements for the two companies to shrink their portfolios.

Geithner said the Treasury is still “firmly committed” to shrinking the firms in the long run. He also reiterated that the two companies are unlikely to exceed previous projections on government assistance.

“Neither company was near the previous $200 billion per institution limit in December, and neither is likely to exceed those caps even under a range of very conservative assumptions,” Geithner said.

The Treasury secretary laid out broad objectives for weighing how to change Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, along with other housing organizations such as the Federal Home Loan Banks and the Federal Housing Administration. He said there are “a variety of mechanisms” the government could use to promote stability and also provide subsidies to parts of the market.

New Incentives

The housing finance system needs to have incentives that are aligned to encourage the mortgage industry to work toward long-term health instead of short-term gains, Geithner said. Private gains shouldn’t be allowed when the public bears the brunt of losses, and mortgage finance companies should be required to hold sufficient capital and avoid abusive practices.

Mortgage products should be standardized and support a liquid secondary market, with a broad base of investors and “accurate and transparent pricing,” Geithner said. Government housing policy should aim to promote widely available mortgage credit, financial stability and affordable housing options for lower-income households, he said.

“Action is needed to ensure that markets are more stable, consumers are protected, credit is widely accessible and important housing policy objectives, such as affordable housing for low and moderate income families, are administered effectively and efficiently,” Geithner said. “Government has a key role to play in that new system, but its role, and the role of the GSEs in particular, will be fundamentally different from the role played in the past.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Rebecca Christie in Washington at rchristie4@bloomberg.netPhil Mattingly in Washington at pmattingly@bloomberg.net;

Posted on Tue, Mar. 23, 2010

Bank-regulation bill headed for Senate fight

By Jim Kuhnhenn

Associated Press

WASHINGTON – Republicans abandoned their effort to alter Wall Street regulatory legislation in a key Senate committee yesterday, leaving the fight for the full Senate, and clouding prospects for a bipartisan bill.

Republicans had offered more than 300 amendments to legislation proposed by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, but they withdrew them over the weekend. That cleared the way for a quick party-line vote yesterday: The committee approved Dodd’s bill, with the 13 Democrats in favor and the 10 Republicans opposed.

The surprise development by the committee’s Republicans did nothing to mend the partisan fissures over the legislation and adds more uncertainty to Congress’ ability to pass a sweeping rewrite of financial regulations this year. The full Senate would take up the bill in April at the earliest.

“You’ll have Easter recess, and that’s when, I guess, over the course of the next several weeks . . . the real negotiations will be taking place,” said Sen. Bob Corker (R., Tenn.), a member of the committee who had held negotiations with Dodd.

Dodd unveiled his bill on March 15, 18 months after Wall Street’s failures helped plunge the U.S. into the worst recession since the 1930s. The legislation would give the government unprecedented powers to split up firms so large that they are considered a threat to the economy, put together a council of regulators to watch for risks in the financial system, and create an independent consumer watchdog.

With more than 300 Republican amendments and nearly 100 Democratic changes, committee members had prepared themselves for a long and arduous week of debate and votes on the bill.

Dodd did accept 25 Democratic amendments, including one sought by Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. chairwoman Sheila Bair that she said would prevent unintended bailouts of large financial institutions.

Democrats and Republicans are split over the need for an independent consumer entity. But other issues also divide the parties, including how to regulate complex trading instruments, such as derivatives, and what firms should be exempt from new rules. (Derivatives, securities whose value is based on underlying assets, were at the root of the financial system’s 2008 meltdown.)

Industry lobbyists said the decision to move swiftly through committee made it much more difficult to predict what the full Senate would ultimately do with the legislation.

Corker suggested that the bill, the subject of months of negotiations by Dodd and members of his committee, needed a new environment.

“It’s probably true that we have a better opportunity with a different cast of characters, the full Senate, to do something that is sound policy-wise,” Corker said.


Login



Categories

Peter Buchsbaum I Pennsylvania Mortgage Banker I NMLS #133257